[ Home ] [ About ] [ Reviews ][ Interviews ] [ Chat ] [ APH ] [ Links ] [ What's New ] [ Xanga Journal ]

quick partner shopping links:  [adult video universe]  [sugar dvd]  [gamelink]  [porn link bonanza (old school)]   [porn link bonanza (remix)]

  [community posting guidelines]

 



Go Back   Snowman's Raincoat Reviews Forums > Strictly Porn > adult legal issues and news

Notices

adult legal issues and news legal issues, recent cases and other news affecting the adult industry


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2009, 05:50 PM
srrRSSbot's Avatar
srrRSSbot srrRSSbot is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,477
srrRSSbot is on a distinguished road
Default Privacy Claim Based on Republication of Web Posting Is Rejected

Comments posted on a publicly accessible website are not private and the poster cannot sue for invasion of privacy when the comments are republished, according to a California appellate court.

More...

Source: XBiz
Publication Date: 04-06-2009 04:15 PM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2009, 07:05 PM
Snowman's Avatar
Snowman Snowman is offline
Your Host
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 8,825
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 4
Snowman has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to Snowman Send a message via MSN to Snowman Send a message via Yahoo to Snowman
Default Re: Privacy Claim Based on Republication of Web Posting Is Rejected

Below is a snippet from the Xbiz article listed above:

FRESNO, Calif. — Comments posted on a publicly accessible website are not private and the poster cannot sue for invasion of privacy when the comments are republished, according to a California appellate court.

California’s 5th District Court of Appeal last week affirmed a Fresno Superior Court judgment, which rejected a claim from a UC Berkeley student, whose MySpace.com page included a phrase that she “despise[d]” her hometown of Coalinga.

The case is of significant interest to the adult entertainment industry, which heavily uses message boards and social-networking sites to market their products, personas and other activities.

It emphasizes the obvious in the court of law: Anything one posts can and will be used against them.***
The actual case is CYNTHIA MORENO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HANFORD SENTINEL, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. F054138. Fifth Dist. Apr. 2, 2009.
__________________
-- Snowman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
forums, laws, legal issues, privacy

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Community Posting Guidelines snowman872 srr & forum 411 & 911 10 05-26-2009 11:39 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM.


18 U.S.C. 2257 Compliance (Custodian of Records). Use of this Site assumes acceptance of the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Help support SRR by shopping at or joining partner sites. Click any banner or website listed on the porn link bonanza! For advertising opportunities, click here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009, Snowman's Raincoat Reviews. All Rights Reserved.
Page generated in 0.48502 seconds with 13 queries